[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Jonathan De Graeve" <Jonathan dot De dot Graeve at imelda dot be>
 To:  "Manuel Kasper" <mk at neon1 dot net>
 Cc:  <m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall-dev] RE: [m0n0wall] The future
 Date:  Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:17:47 +0200
What about perl?

Supports, 00, is not TOO difficult and can be compiled directly to an
executable :D

But I still like to keep PHP since all the work people put into it.

J. 

-- 
Jonathan De Graeve
Network/System Administrator
Imelda vzw
Informatica Dienst
015/50.52.98
jonathan dot de dot graeve at imelda dot be

---------
Always read the manual for the correct way to do things because the
number of incorrect ways to do things is almost infinite
---------

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Manuel Kasper [mailto:mk at neon1 dot net] 
Verzonden: woensdag 12 oktober 2005 17:07
Aan: Jonathan De Graeve
CC: m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Onderwerp: Re: [m0n0wall-dev] RE: [m0n0wall] The future

On 12.10.05 16:58 +0200, Jonathan De Graeve wrote:

> But I think PHP could do this without any problems. If you talk
> about gcj you also can start developing stuff in C (++) ;)

GCJ was just an example - we could also use one of the small Java VMs
that are available. Java offers many advantages over C++ that make
programming easier and safer. Granted, maybe not more efficient, but
it should be much faster than an interpreted language like PHP
anyway. ;)

That said, Java per-se was only an example too - I'm just not
convinced that a daemon in PHP (that needs to deal with things like
multi-threading) would be feasible, fast and reliable. Furthermore, I
think OO in PHP is clumsy at best.

- Manuel

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash dev dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash dev dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch