On Wednesday 12 October 2005 16:06, Manuel Kasper wrote:
> On 12.10.05 16:58 +0200, Jonathan De Graeve wrote:
> > But I think PHP could do this without any problems. If you talk
> > about gcj you also can start developing stuff in C (++) ;)
> GCJ was just an example - we could also use one of the small Java VMs
> that are available. Java offers many advantages over C++ that make
> programming easier and safer. Granted, maybe not more efficient, but
> it should be much faster than an interpreted language like PHP
> anyway. ;)
> That said, Java per-se was only an example too - I'm just not
> convinced that a daemon in PHP (that needs to deal with things like
> multi-threading) would be feasible, fast and reliable. Furthermore, I
> think OO in PHP is clumsy at best.
1. Perl is just another weakly-type language + OO
2. PHP5 is a pretty good OO environment (arguably as good as if not better
3. Can I offer Python as a possibility? It is naturally OO (literally the
whole thing is a bunch of objects). It compiles down to a .pyc bytecode ala
java and is becoming well supported and used
In regards to an OS.
I have been playing (a lot) with a linksys device called an NSLU2 and
replacement software called OpenSLUG (www.openslug.org). This shows that you
can make a mean and lean Linux, with a mature development environment from
OpenEbedded. Maybe Linux is the way to go (I can't beleive I am saying
If you move from FreeBSD my vote would be for OpenBSD. There is a lot of
clunky stuff in FreeBSD 4.x (like bridging) that may have been fixed in 6.x.
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.