[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Chris Dickens" <chris at object dash zone dot net>
 To:  <m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall-dev] The future
 Date:  Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:00:54 -0400
I don't think you understand what I'm talking about:

http://doc.m0n0.ch/handbook/faq-lannat.html

--Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniele Guazzoni [mailto:daniele dot guazzoni at gcomm dot ch] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 6:48 PM
Cc: m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall-dev] The future


Chris Dickens wrote:
> Whatever direction you go, please select one where internal interfaces 
> behind NAT can access other systems that are also behind NAT on a 
> different interface.  This continues to cause me lots of manual labor.

Technically seen this is always possible since NAT is a 1-to-1 IP 
translation...
You are talking about PAT or P-NAT.
Well, communications over a double PAT sounds for me like IP over ICMP 
and RCP over HTTP and other similar "way to let the world turn in the 
other sense"

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash dev dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash dev dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch