On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 13:24 -0500, Leonard Nielsen wrote:
> Is there any chance
> of retaining the ability to define latency and packet loss like we can with
> IPfilter and Dummynet or is this the end of that road? Does anyone think
> they can port Dummynet type functionality to these newer modules?
Good point - everybody knows the benefits of PF, but there are some
losses. Since it seems that everyone agrees that m0n0 should go to PF,
it couldn't hurt to begin building a list of 'gotchas'. Besides the
above point, last I knew PF couldn't:
1) Filter based on packet size - The small packet rules will have to be
re-written in the shaper wizard.
2) Do source or destination masking - I know of no way to acheive the
masking with PF that you can with Dummynet
Anyone care to add or correct items on the list?