[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Dinesh Nair <dinesh at alphaque dot com>
 To:  Jim Thompson <jim at netgate dot com>
 Cc:  Kris Maglione <bsdaemon at comcast dot net>, Chris Buechler <cbuechler at gmail dot com>, m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall-dev] The future - summary
 Date:  Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:08:49 +0800
On 10/14/05 15:10 Jim Thompson said the following:
> which doesn't explain why people are able to run JVMs in cell phones  
> with less memory
> than the cache on your machine.

very much reduced instruction set. to handle this, i doubt we have the 
resources to maintain a reduced instruction set JVM for m0n0wall.

> Also, no need to fork per-request or thread, we've known how to use  
> select() (and poll()) for a long time.

which may make sense, since we wouldnt expect the daemon to handle 
thousands of requests per second. 50 or so would suffice.

Regards,                           /\_/\   "All dogs go to heaven."
dinesh at alphaque dot com                (0 0)    http://www.alphaque.com/
| for a in past present future; do                                        |
|   for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do   |
|   echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b."  |
| done; done                                                              |