Typically, versioning is a very user-centric thing.  From a user's point of
view, the next version of monoawll should really feel, taste and smell the
same as 1.2, just a bunch of stuff underneath will have changed.  Going to
2.0 would give the impression that many new user accessible features should
be available.  I do not believe this will be the case.

--Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Lloyd Palfrey [mailto:Lloyd at wsufftrust dot org dot uk] 
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 10:45 AM
To: Chris Buechler; m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall-dev] 1.3 OS attributes/feature list - no comments?


Yah sounds good :)

On another note, with such major changes in mind, maybe calling it 2.0 might
be more appropriate?

- Lloyd



-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:cbuechler at gmail dot com]
Sent: Sat 10/15/2005 7:51 PM
To: m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: [m0n0wall-dev] 1.3 OS attributes/feature list - no comments?
 
I didn't get a single reply to:
http://m0n0.ch/wall/list-dev/showmsg.php?id=11/21

even a "yeah, that sounds like it'll do it" would be nice.  :)

silence implies consent?

-Chris

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash dev dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash dev dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch