Manuel Kasper wrote:
>>- on Yes/No questions, I'd imagine people will be allowed to skip
>>questions, but we may want to make note of that or put in a field
>Uhm... that was already there, and in bold type - but I've
>highlighted it even more now.
I think that the idea was to have, on each field, an 'Other/NA/Don't
care' or a 'This field is optional'/non-bold title/something else to
indicate that the question is optional.
Yes, it says it at the top, but most people don't read the
instructions/explanations. Even if they do, by the time that they get
down to question 18 of so, they don't remember.
Also, some of the yes/no questions really do merit a Don't know/Don't
care type of answer.
As a side note, I'd like to see a question about the back-end
protocol... something like XML-RPC/SOAP/Other: please specify. Someone
may have a genuinely good suggestion in that area.