[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Kris Maglione <bsdaemon at comcast dot net>
 To:  Manuel Kasper <mk at neon1 dot net>, m0n0wall-dev <m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall-dev] Survey
 Date:  Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:12:43 -0400
Manuel Kasper wrote:

>>- on Yes/No questions, I'd imagine people will be allowed to skip
>>questions, but we may want to make note of that or put in a field
>Uhm... that was already there, and in bold type - but I've
>highlighted it even more now.
I think that the idea was to have, on each field, an 'Other/NA/Don't
care' or a 'This field is optional'/non-bold title/something else to
indicate that the question is optional.

Yes, it says it at the top, but most people don't read the
instructions/explanations. Even if they do, by the time that they get
down to question 18 of so, they don't remember.

Also, some of the yes/no questions really do merit a Don't know/Don't
care type of answer.

As a side note, I'd like to see a question about the back-end
protocol... something like XML-RPC/SOAP/Other: please specify. Someone
may have a genuinely good suggestion in that area.