[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Max Khitrov <max at mxserve dot net>
 To:  m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall-dev] Replacement for CPU/Memory graph
 Date:  Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:38:37 -0400
Max Khitrov wrote:
> Alex Pimperton wrote:
> 
>> The SVG graph is one of the features I struggle with as i'm often 
>> swapping between computers that don't have SVG installed, and 
>> downloading and installing the plugin everytime gets very boring.
> 
> 
> I'm with you on that one, but since there does seem to be quite a lot of 
> support for SVG, how about we change the discussion a little bit...
> 
> Why not use SVG as the default presentation, but also put in a check to 
> see if the user's browser supports SVG. If not, then have a fallback 
> mechanism that's something like my graph.
> 
> Both use the same interface to retrieve the data, so it's only a matter 
> of adding a few extra files to the distribution. If there's no way to 
> check if SVG is supported on a browser (haven't dealt with SVG, so don't 
> know), then make it an option for the user to pick. No real downside to 
> it IMHO.
> 
> - Max

So is this issue dead or what? Just out of curiosity, I just installed 
Firefox 1.5 Beta 2 - it does show the graph, but there's no data on it, 
so I don't know where you guys are getting the support from.

Would really like to see some alternative to the SVG graph, whatever it 
is...

- Max