[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  taharka <res00vl8 at alltel dot net>
 To:  m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall-dev] Replacement for CPU/Memory graph
 Date:  Sun, 23 Oct 2005 08:20:52 -0400
Howdy,

Max Khitrov wrote:

> Max Khitrov wrote:
>
>> Alex Pimperton wrote:
>>
>>> The SVG graph is one of the features I struggle with as i'm often 
>>> swapping between computers that don't have SVG installed, and 
>>> downloading and installing the plugin everytime gets very boring.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm with you on that one, but since there does seem to be quite a lot 
>> of support for SVG, how about we change the discussion a little bit...
>>
>> Why not use SVG as the default presentation, but also put in a check 
>> to see if the user's browser supports SVG. If not, then have a 
>> fallback mechanism that's something like my graph.
>>
>> Both use the same interface to retrieve the data, so it's only a 
>> matter of adding a few extra files to the distribution. If there's no 
>> way to check if SVG is supported on a browser (haven't dealt with 
>> SVG, so don't know), then make it an option for the user to pick. No 
>> real downside to it IMHO.
>>
>> - Max
>
>
> So is this issue dead or what? Just out of curiosity, I just installed 
> Firefox 1.5 Beta 2 - it does show the graph, but there's no data on 
> it, so I don't know where you guys are getting the support from.
>
In Firefox 1.5 Beta 2, you can click on Tools>JavaScript Console & you 
can see where the code is failing. I'm running the latest nightly on, 
FC3 (Mozilla/5.0 X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b5 Gecko/20051022 
Firefox/1.5). The traffic graph is pretty funky looking but, the CPU 
graph displays fine, just no data.

> Would really like to see some alternative to the SVG graph, whatever 
> it is...
>
> - Max
>
taharka

Lexington, Kentucky U.S.A.