[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Jonathan De Graeve" <Jonathan dot De dot Graeve at imelda dot be>
 To:  "Andres Petralli" <apetralli at icu dot unizh dot ch>, "m0n0wall Developer's List" <m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall-dev] m0n0router perhaps?
 Date:  Tue, 25 Oct 2005 21:48:38 +0200
I'm just recommending this amount of memory if you also will use other
features as well. With this you can setup larger kernel mbufs...

Every decent cisco has a min of 64MB these days and most larger routers
at least 256MB....


J.

--
Jonathan De Graeve
Network/System Administrator
Imelda vzw
Informatica Dienst
015/50.52.98
Jonathan dot de dot graeve at imelda dot be

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Andres Petralli [mailto:apetralli at icu dot unizh dot ch] 
Verzonden: dinsdag 25 oktober 2005 21:27
Aan: m0n0wall Developer's List
Onderwerp: Re: [m0n0wall-dev] m0n0router perhaps?

Hi Jonathan,

On 25.10.2005, at 20:07, Jonathan De Graeve wrote:


> The image grows with at least 10MB (compiled binaries:
> OSPF/BGP/ISIS/RIP/SNMP) and would require a minimum of 256MB for good
> system performance...
>

I think I could find a CF card with 10MB more storage for that kind  
of added functionality :) . But 256MB memory seems a bit much to me.  
I think you will only need this if you are going to have BGP4  
uplinks. Any other routing protocol should only have a very low added  
impact on the memory usage.

Kind regards,

Andres


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash dev dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash dev dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch