Let us know if you would like specific tests for measurement data.
We'll be happy to run any tests you have in mind.
Scott
On 11/21/05, Dinesh Nair <dinesh at alphaque dot com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/22/05 06:51 Scott Ullrich said the following:
> > megabits on a 266 megahertz WRAP to 28.5 megabit. inflight is really
> > meant for overly congested links and really hurts performance. NOTE
>
> robert watson's posts to freebsd-net indicate that in high bandwidth, low
> latency links (such as your average LAN), inflight enabled actually drops
> performance.
>
> on a Celeron 400Mhz with 128MB RAM and intel etherexpress onboard NICs,
> i've been able to get near wire speed throughput (80+Mbps with iperf) on
> the 1.2 and 1.3a1 images, with or without inflight enabled. this doesnt
> indicate much however for the Celeron is beefy enough a processor for what
> we're throwing at it. we'd need to use a processor which maxed out /before/
> wire speed throughput was reached, if we're to really benchmark the IP
> stack difference between freebsd 4.x and 6.0.
>
> a better benchmark would be doing the same on the soekris net45xx and 48xx
> boxes for the lower speed processor there would max out before the wire
> speed is ever reached.
>
> --
> Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven."
> dinesh at alphaque dot com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/
> +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+
> | for a in past present future; do |
> | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do |
> | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." |
> | done; done |
> +=========================================================================+
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash dev dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash dev dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>
>
| 