Paul,
Thanks for the reply. Your reasoning makes sense. I can see where that 
would be desirable.

Bottom line, I'm not asking you or the core dev team as a whole to 
modify anything. I am just curious about the thought process behind that 
features functionality.

Thanks,
Andrew

Paul Taylor wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
> 	Actually, I made the decision on how that would work, since I added
> the feature.  This is a slightly different situation than for dialup users.
> We felt that legitimate users would rather have the ability to easily switch
> machines without having to wait for their logon to timeout on the previous
> machine.  We don't expect this situation to happen frequently, but we don't
> want to get support calls if that comes up.  We don't run the pop-up window
> that allows logouts, as most people would probably have pop-up blockers that
> would stop it from working anyhow...
> 
> How Monowall reacts to this could be made an option, potentially...  
> 
> Paul
>