Thanks for the reply. Your reasoning makes sense. I can see where that
would be desirable.
Bottom line, I'm not asking you or the core dev team as a whole to
modify anything. I am just curious about the thought process behind that
Paul Taylor wrote:
> Actually, I made the decision on how that would work, since I added
> the feature. This is a slightly different situation than for dialup users.
> We felt that legitimate users would rather have the ability to easily switch
> machines without having to wait for their logon to timeout on the previous
> machine. We don't expect this situation to happen frequently, but we don't
> want to get support calls if that comes up. We don't run the pop-up window
> that allows logouts, as most people would probably have pop-up blockers that
> would stop it from working anyhow...
> How Monowall reacts to this could be made an option, potentially...