[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Lee Sharp" <leesharp at hal dash pc dot org>
 To:  <m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall-dev] Differences between Soekris Wrap and PC
 Date:  Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:54:19 -0600
From: "Manuel Kasper" <mk at neon1 dot net>

> The wrap images have a specially patched bootloader that doesn't
> fiddle with gate A20 (see page 12 of
> http://www.pcengines.ch/wrap1c.pdf), so generic-pc images won't boot
> on a WRAP (unless the BIOS has been changed in the meantime).

From: "Chris Buechler" <cbuechler at gmail dot com>

> kernel configs are the only major difference.  you can find them here:
> http://m0n0.ch/wall/downloads/freebsd-4.11/

> config.xml has only minor differences, I believe only that the
> interfaces come pre-assigned (and they may be pre-assigned to the same
> on the PC image, I don't recall offhand).

Let me summarize for the next guy to search.... :-)
A different kernel for all 4.
A different config.xml and default config.
A different boot loader for WRAP.

So, if I took Jonathan's image, and copied in those three files from a WRAP 
image, it might work?  Or would it be better to copy Jonathan's changes into 
a 1.2stable Wrap image?


And a silly point, but I checked twice...  What image is supposed to be used 
on the Nokia IP1* series?