[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Jonathan De Graeve" <Jonathan dot De dot Graeve at imelda dot be>
 To:  <w dot plein at gmail dot com>, "m0n0wall" <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>, <m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall-dev] RE: [m0n0wall] M0n0cache
 Date:  Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:45:59 +0100
> My personal opinion: Keep it separate, a dedicated system image. I
moved
> back to m0n0wall from pfsense because I run in a WRAP platform and
pfsense
> was becoming non-optimized for the WRAP platform.
It is separate

> I like m0n0wall small,
> fast, and optimized for my embedded platform. I wouldn't mind running
a
> m0n0cache on a separate box, however.
That will be the case when I get a go from my management. (otherwise it
will take a lot longer since it will be in spare time ;) but I'm pretty
certain it will be something in between (30% work, 70% spare))

J.