On 14 feb , at 10:20, Jonathan De Graeve wrote:
> I propose to implement this in a different project m0n0cache

Well, *if* there is going to be something like that, I think it  
should include more of the stuff that refuses to go into m0n0wall and  
for which a separate box is typically needed (e.g. also MTA  
functionality, ntpd, radius...). That would suggest a name such as  
m0n0proxy.

But frankly, there is already something like it: m0n0bsd. Grab it and  
install whatever you want. Any extra effort is better spent getting  
m0n0bsd up-to-date (haven't seen much happen there lately), instead  
of launching a separate project.

--Bart