[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Alex WC Lee <alexeen at noservice dot net>
 To:  Jayden Phillips <trainguy77 at shaw dot ca>
 Cc:  m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall-dev] Pfsense vs m0n0wall
 Date:  Sun, 19 Feb 2006 02:23:56 -0500
Well, for m0n0wall, I can put it on a Soekris NET4801 with a 266MHz
processor and the processor usually idles at 0-3% and response from the
web administration is quite fast. Though, with pfsense, the CPU is
constantly at 100%, and web response is much slower, so I assume one
would need a more powerful processor for pfsense. For me, m0n0wall +
edward's hack for transparent proxying did the trick and I gave up on
pfsense. So it really depends if you need those extra features provided
by pfsense (ie. SSH, plugins, etc...).

~Alex

Jayden Phillips said the following on 02/18/2006 11:03 PM:
> Just wondering what are the performance comparisons of m0n0wall and Pfsense.
> How does Pfsense's FreeBSD 6 hold up to m0n0wall. This may help us decide
> what OS to go with. Of coarse pfsense has all sorts of other stuff added.
> And I was just wondering.
> 
> Jayden
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash dev dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash dev dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>