On 6/22/06, Holger Bauer <Holger dot Bauer at citec dash ag dot de> wrote:
> You misunderstood Scott. When he uses "we" he's talking about pfSense there(as he's the
projectleader).
>
> So what he wanted to say with that:
> m0n0wall: target is embedded, small footprint, ...
> pfSense (we): target is bigger and better hardware, thus no melting of pfSense and m0n0 intended.

Exactly.  Sorry for the mis-information.   For the record I am one of
the 2 founders of pfSense.  So whenever I say "we" I speak of pfSense
directly.  But make no mistake I am batting for m0n0wall 100% as well
as obviously this is where pfSense was born from.  Sorry for the
confusion.

Scott