> > What are you current thoughts on this whole area? (Or perhaps I
> > should ask if your view has changed since the last time this was
> > discussed)?
> No, my views on this module business haven't changed. The official
> m0n0wall version is not going to include any provisions to install
> modules at runtime. I don't want m0n0wall to become a module
> patchwork. Besides, it's difficult to handle this with all the
> different platforms (let alone the fact that 50% of the generic-pc
> installations use the CD-ROM version). The module interface was
> created mainly for the convenience of those who want to develop
> special-purpose features (so they wouldn't have to merge their
> changes manually with each new release). It was never intended for
> normal users.
For the record, I AGREE with you that m0n0wall should not be allowed to become
a module patchwork. I think the fact that 50% of genric-pc installs use a CD
version is actually the issue. I am not sure that there is an easy way of
getting a module into one of these (although I may be miising something
here), hence my interest in the on-the-fly installation.
> As I've said (and demonstrated) before, modules that satisfy a
> general interest, don't introduce a lot of bloat, don't break
> anything else and match the code (and GUI) quality of the base system
> stand a good chance of being included in the official release.
Indeed - I am particularly pleased to have the magic shaper wizard.
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.