[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Dan Bond" <dan dot bond at gmail dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall-dev] SVG Graphs in Firefox 3.0a3
 Date:  Wed, 7 Mar 2007 17:03:13 +0000
On 07/03/07, taharka <res00vl8 at alltel dot net> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 11:33 -0500, taharka wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 06:50 +0000, Dan Bond wrote:
> > > On 06/03/07, taharka <res00vl8 at alltel dot net> wrote:
> > > > How do,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 22:28 +0000, Dan Bond wrote:
> > > > > I know that it's still in the alpha stages but thought it might be of
> > > > > interest to people and would be curious if there's an obvious fix.
> > > > > Here is a screenshot of the svg graph generated by my 1.3b2 m0n0 using
> > > > > Firefox 3.0a3: http://img69.imageshack.us/my.php?image=screenshotaq1.png
> > > >
> > > > Firefox 3.0a3 on what OS? window$, Linux, Unix, etc?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Sorry, OS X 10.4.8, PPC. Using the native rendering of SVG in Firefox
> > > not the plugin, just in case that wasn't clear.
> >
> > OK, just checking. After looking at your screenshot, I have the exact
> > same problem with, FF 2.0.0.1 on win98SE. Graph displays fine but, no
> > mb/s kb/s for wan/lan displayed. Upgraded to FF 2.0.0.2 and the problem
> > persists :-( However, both of these versions of FF display properly
> > running on openSUSE/Fedora Core Linux systems :-) Perhaps this is an OS
> > specific issue?
>
> Well now, hold the phone!! This is odd, I just went into about:config,
> changed svg.enabled from true to false and lo and behold, the traffic
> graph is now displaying properly :-)) Go figure eh?

Figure that's because you've got the Adobe SVG plugin installed, which
I don't think people have an issue with. The issue is with the Mozilla
implementation of SVG and how it's rendered. Somewhere in the back of
my mind I seem to remember something about some implementations not
holding as strictly to the spec as they should (what's new), is it
that the m0n0 SVG has been written to work with the Adobe plugin
because it's  the dominant solution? Is this like trying to write a
webpage for IE6?

Dan

>
> > > > > Clearly there's something a little wrong with the text, although it
> > > > > seems to draw fine which is good.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for all the hard work everyone's putting into this, is really appreciated
> > > > >
> > > > > Dan Bond
> > > >
> > > > taharka
> > > >
> > > > Lexington, Kentucky U.S.A.
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash dev dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash dev dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash dev dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash dev dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>
>