[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Chris Dickens" <chris at object dash zone dot net>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>, <m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall-dev] m0n0AP - m0n0Cored Project Launch
 Date:  Fri, 3 Aug 2007 19:43:06 -0400
The name of the project should be logical rather than physical.  Users
will not understand m0n0core is a firewall.  Maybe you can find some
variation on the current product's name which still sounds like a
firewall but still not be mistaken for the existing FreeBSD based

Users don't care if it has a fancy new core architecture, they want to
see something like "m0n0wall II" or "m0n0wall extreme" - something
creative. :-)

If you want to give it an internal pet name, I suppose you could start
using gemstones or something like that - and then you really haven't a
clue what it is just from the internal name.  Afterall, who'd have
guessed Longhorn is an operating system without someone telling you? :-)


-----Original Message-----
From: Junior Gillespie [mailto:junior dot gillespie at gmail dot com] 
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 7:08 PM
To: Jayden Phillips; m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch; m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall-dev] m0n0AP - m0n0Cored Project Launch

On 8/3/07, Jayden Phillips <trainguy77 at shaw dot ca> wrote:
> Well why not keep the name m0n0wall. As its still going to be the
> same thing just with more modular design am i correct?

 That's a good question! We could probably keep a partial "m0n0" in the
project name, and being known as m0n0Cored isn't so bad. But the reason
were not m0n0wall is because this is a new design/architecture, and
fall in line with the current m0n0wall. I've talked with Manuel, and
thumbs up with the idea of furthering this project, and hopefully being
to replace m0n0wall one day. Therefore, this is not m0n0wall, but a
into what could be.

I'm okay with m0n0Core or m0n0Cored, but we need to differentiate
from m0n0wall, as a m0n0wall derived project with intentions of being
"NEW" m0n0wall. Also, were deviating from the original FreeBSD OS, and
looking at a multi-OS solution that is BSD and Linux based.

I think we
> need to be sure to get a team going with different people having
> different responsibilities or the same thing will happen where its
> very few people running the ship they did a great job but we don't
> want to burn them out.

I agree, and thats why were going to adhere to an Organizational Chart
specific duties.

I am willing to setup the forum once its
> installed on a forum. However, I am not any good at web design, so
> did we want to redesign the entire page? and why? I am not really a
> developer but i am very technically minded so i am willing to help
> with user guides forums whatever else needs being done. By the way i
> am leaving tommorow for 2 weeks so if your wondering why i don't
> respond thats why.
> Jayden
> I think we need our own web presence, with our own intentions and
and eventually one day merge back into m0n0wall once we've developed a
stable solution.