> Users don't care if it has a fancy new core architecture, they want to
> see something like "m0n0wall II" or "m0n0wall extreme" - something
> creative. :-)

if the next version of m0n0wall is indeed a ... err ... super spiced
up version of the actual software with a much better underlying
infrastructure, for which a simple increase in version number would
not reflect the improvements, maybe you could use the name m1n1wall
then.

Amaury