[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Tonix (Antonio Nati)" <tonix at interazioni dot it>
 To:  Mono Dev List <m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall-dev] Redesigning m0n0wall filter rules
 Date:  Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:57:53 +0100
Lee Sharp ha scritto:
> Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
>> If monowall people is so closely bind to the WAN, LAN, OPT1 model, 
>> there is very few to discuss. Then it's time to start a m1n1 project, 
>> with wider views.
>
> I am not sure where you got this, but it ain't from us.  Many of the 
> core people on this list have at least one (or many more) firewall 
> with 10+ interfaces on it.  However we often support people that have 
> multiple interfaces for absolutely no reason.  One guy wanted to 
> bridge 5 interfaces because he could not afford a switch!  So we teach 
> the LAN WAN Opt1 model to beginners because they are beginners.  We 
> also use the inbound model because it is simple to understand.  
> Complexity breads mistakes which lead to insecurity.  The Pix is a 
> very secure firewall, but is often deployed insecurely by people who 
> do not understand it. Not a surprise as the Pix is a lesson in user 
> unfriendliness...

So, you think helping people giving less choises.
Add a system flag about which kind of rules can be enabled: inbound,
outbound, mixed.
Give the opportunity to make more, and each one can chose his own model
(based on his own experience).

>
>> But if you consider that this firewall is very used because of the 
>> speed, and because of the speed is used in a lot of big 
>> configurations, where people has:
>
> [snip vlan party]
>
>> than you may see that
>>
>>    * ONE  outbound rule written in the server VLAN eliminates the need
>>      for other 11 rules which should be written in each of the other
>>      interfaces.
>
> Only if all other interfaces are wide open inbound.  This is not what 
> I do on any system I manage.

Why??? You don't need to open inbound on other interfaces for allowing
outbound. It depends on the position of the rule.

> [ snip ]
>> I hope monowall is ready to make the step to be a more complete 
>> firewall.
>
> We have made a conscious decision to not make m0n0wall the HP 
> All-In-One-Printer of firewalls.  m0n0wall is meant to be lean, mean, 
> and above all secure.  So far what you have proposed gives some small 
> convenience at a substantial cost in complexity and security.
>
> However, the biggest problem is that you seem to not want to consider 
> that there are other ways of doing this.  It would be easy to add a 
> script on each interface page, "Create reciprocal inbound rules."  
> When you click that it gives all the usual fields but the interface 
> field would allow you to ctl-click all or some of the interfaces.

In which position in the other interfaces lists? Before all? After all?

> As to management, I agree that a page that would allow you to view all 
> interfaces filtered by a given parameter would be nice.  This only 
> requires some php programming, and NO CHANGES TO THE CORE OF M0N0WALL.

Also what I ask requires only PHP programming. No change to the core,
just a different way of writing rules.

> Also there is a m0n0wall management project that could allow you to 
> write a firewall client to make rules however you want them. However, 
> if you are dead set on core changes, then by all means fork it.  There 
> are several forks of m0n0wall, and all have made a positive 
> contribution. (FreeNAS, pfSense, AskoziaPBX)  You can even find the 
> devs of those projects all over the m0n0wall lists.  You may have 
> something a lot of other people want.  I, however, am not one of 
> them.  And judging by the lack response here, neither are a lot of 
> other developers.  However, (I seem to be using that word a lot) if 
> you do fork the project, I would give you any information and help 
> that I could.  I am sure that most of the other people here would as 
> well, if you keep us on good terms.

I appreciate your help, but I'm not willing to fork, unless I have no
choice (just because I have too much work.to do on other products).
Before forking I will consider also other open source firewalls, as well
as funding m0n0 (or pfsense) for making what I ask.

Thanks,

Tonino

>             Lee
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash dev dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash dev dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>
>


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
        Inter@zioni            Interazioni di Antonio Nati
   http://www.interazioni.it      tonix at interazioni dot it
------------------------------------------------------------