Manuel Kasper wrote:
> On 17.02.2008, at 12:52, JR wrote:
>> It's interesting that m0n0wall is even mentioned on that page, yet it
>> does not follow the recommendation provided.
> I've no idea why they list m0n0wall on that page. I was never contacted
> by them about this.
It is because m0n0wall is so awesome. :) Actually, every time I mention
it in the open source community, a few knowledgeable people say, "I use
m0n0wall and it is fantastic." We may not get much press, but we are
>> I usually change my m0n0walls' ntp server anyway to get the benefit of
>> using geographically closer servers, but I suspect many/most do not,
>> and I think respecting the guidelines put forth by those providing the
>> pool.ntp.org service is the responsible thing to do.
> Yes, that's right... Thanks for digging up this information!
Mine are us.pool.ntp.org as well. A simple line recommending picking a
close geographic location and a link to www.ntp.org should be enough.