I don't think Manuel will go this way. As he already stated: "M0n0wall 
was designed to be a packet filter". So adding this kind of features 
will be recomended on full FreeBSD stations, not one minimal distro.

He sometimes is a litle restrictive on this kind of patches. Like, I'm 
working hard on monowall to have it internationalized, but he didn't 
said anything about it. I don't know if it will be a good or bad thing 
to do with monowall, but I'm doing to help people to work with it in a 
more pleasant way.

Another thing I did last week was two patches to have a litle increase 
in m0n0wall console security, but no one said anything about, if it was 
a god thing or a bad thing.

I will keep developing things for m0n0wall to my needs, and very soon I 
will have a monowalll patch page, for those things that are not in 
m0n0wall main distro.


Jean

Matt Juszczak wrote:
> I think it would be cool to have m0n0wall built in the future not on a 
> config file in xml but in a local copy of mysql .... that way 
> configuration options could be set to store the data remotely and custom 
> applications could easily be developed "off site" to manipulate the data.