[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Peter Curran <peter at closeconsultants dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall-dev] Re: [m0n0wall] Restriction Modifications
 Date:  Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:30:21 +0100
Chris

I had a quick look at the ICSA docs on your site, but there is too much for me 
to look at the detail at the moment.  In your opinion, apart from the console 
lock-down issue, what else would have to be done to make m0n0 ICSA-compliant?

Peter

> With the console open, it would fail this specific ICSA objective:
> ST1 ? Administrative Access Testing ? The Candidate Firewall Product
> must demonstrate through testing that no unauthorized control of its
> Administrative Functions can be obtained.
>
> m0n0wall would be the only non-commercial ICSA certified firewall if
> the project that's considering paying for it worked out.  I think it
> would be great for the project, give it some 3rd party credibility.
> It's not cheap though, at about $25K USD per year to maintain
> certification.
>

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Curran				  Leveraging Internet Technology
Close Consultants			       for Businesses
p: +44-1225-463700			 
f: +44-1225-463705			  
e: peter at closeconsultants dot com		  
sip: peter at closeconsultants dot com 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.