On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:12:15 -0300, Jean Everson Martina
<everson at inf dot ufsc dot br> wrote:
> HI Peter,
> m0n0wall is almost certifiable. The only problems I got were:
> - Console protection (patch I have already did)
> - Hability to disable remote administratios tool (already patched too)
> - Register unsucessfull and sucessfull logins ( I working on it, and I
> having problemsto register the webGui logins. Console ones are ok).
> - Register modification (what time, and who did) of significat security
> parameters (firewall rules) (not did, but very easy to do, is just
> implement a logging function and call it inside the firewall webGui pages).
> Probably there are a few more, but with out this I can't even start our
> internal tests for certification.
I haven't looked at it in detail, but that's definitely a good start.
I think for the most part it's in good shape, just needs a few touch
ups to pass. I'm going to put some time into going through the specs
and helping determine what needs improvement to pass.