On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 12:02:31 +0100, Peter Allgeyer <allgeyer at web dot de> wrote:
> The really problem is state- and NAT-table syncronisation. Without this,
> any failover/vrrp/whatsoever solution doesn't make much sense. Therefor
> many people thought about using pf/carp. Maybe carp is a solution for
> dynamically assigned IP addresses, I don't know.
From everything I've seen, CARP only works with static public IP's.