[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Chris Buechler <cbuechler at gmail dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall-dev] m0n0wall-failover
 Date:  Fri, 24 Dec 2004 15:44:54 -0500
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 12:02:31 +0100, Peter Allgeyer <allgeyer at web dot de> wrote:
> The really problem is state- and NAT-table syncronisation. Without this,
> any failover/vrrp/whatsoever solution doesn't make much sense. Therefor
> many people thought about using pf/carp. Maybe carp is a solution for
> dynamically assigned IP addresses, I don't know. 

From everything I've seen, CARP only works with static public IP's.