RE: [m0n0wall-dev] ISC dhcpd and dnsmasq

From:	Raffaele Sandrini <rasa at gmx dot ch>
To:	Chris Dickens <chris at object dash zone dot net>
Cc:	m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject:	RE: [m0n0wall-dev] ISC dhcpd and dnsmasq
Date:	Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:00:30 +0100

On Son, 2005-02-13 at 12:50 -0500, Chris Dickens wrote:
> What can we say?  ISC dhcpd is the standard - why deviate?
> 
> --Chris
> 

Because we are wasting space with it? If dnsmasq is not the standard why
are we using it then for DNS instead of bind?

The funny thing is: We are not providing a full featured DNS server but
a full featured DHCP server wich is not fully configurable. We are using
an alternate implementation of a DNS server, dnsmasq, wich can do
exactly the same as we do with the DHCP server.

cheers,
Raffaele
-- 
Raffaele Sandrini <rasa at gmx dot ch>