[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Raffaele Sandrini <rasa at gmx dot ch>
 To:  Chris Dickens <chris at object dash zone dot net>
 Cc:  m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall-dev] ISC dhcpd and dnsmasq
 Date:  Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:00:30 +0100
On Son, 2005-02-13 at 12:50 -0500, Chris Dickens wrote:
> What can we say?  ISC dhcpd is the standard - why deviate?
> --Chris

Because we are wasting space with it? If dnsmasq is not the standard why
are we using it then for DNS instead of bind?

The funny thing is: We are not providing a full featured DNS server but
a full featured DHCP server wich is not fully configurable. We are using
an alternate implementation of a DNS server, dnsmasq, wich can do
exactly the same as we do with the DHCP server.

Raffaele Sandrini <rasa at gmx dot ch>