On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 12:12 -0500, Chris Dickens wrote:
> I agree - let's leave ISC there.  Flash memory ain't expensive any more and
> it's useful for those who are familiar with it's configuration versus
> dnsmasq.
> 
> --Chris

Thats fully ok, i didn't want to start a revolution. I mean dnsmasq is
not nearly as full featured as ISC dhcpd (it may do around the things we
use in m0n0wall).

The static leases problem could be easy solved through the gui by adding
also a static name binding to dnsmasq.

cheers,
Raffaele
-- 
Raffaele Sandrini <rasa at gmx dot ch>