[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Peter Allgeyer <allgeyer at web dot de>
 To:  m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Server NAT really needed?
 Date:  Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:11:13 +0200

I didn't know anything about the term "Server NAT", so I attempted to
become out what this means and what's it relationship to "1:1 NAT". Now
I know, that it means nothing else than doing port forwarding to an
additional WAN IP-address. I found it somewhat confusing!

So what I want to know is, why there's an extra page for it instead of
integrating this into the "inbound NAT" page? Why not just choosing the
interface and typing the IP address in another field (or leaving the
field blank for choosing the main interface address)? Is there a deeper
sense for an additional "Server NAT" tab?

Ciao ...
	... PIT ...

 copyleft(c) by |   _-_     Beeping is cute, if you are in the office ;)
 Peter Allgeyer | 0(o_o)0   -- Alan Cox