[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Peter Allgeyer <allgeyer at web dot de>
 To:  m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Cc:  Manuel Kasper <mk at neon1 dot net>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall-dev] Server NAT really needed?
 Date:  Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:42:30 +0200
Am Donnerstag, den 28.04.2005, 00:30 +0200 schrieb Peter Allgeyer:
> Ok. Don't split hairs! I'll stop this thread now. Was only a try to
> think about making some things clearer.

Since I had some time, I've moved the "Server NAT" page down from the
NAT page to "Edit Inbound NAT" page to bring together what belongs to
each other. I'm still not happy with the term "Server NAT" but don't
want to confuse anybody who is used to it. Anyway, in the long run it's
much better to move this page to a global object definition page where I
can define objects and group them together to object-groups for further
processing through NAT and filter rules (still waiting for ipfilter to
support this).

Ciao ...
	... PIT ...


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 copyleft(c) by |           #if _FP_W_TYPE_SIZE <&nbsp;64 #error "Only
 Peter Allgeyer |   _-_     stud muffins allowed, schmuck." #endif  --
                | 0(o_o)0   linux/arch/sparc64/quad.c
---------------oOO--(_)--OOo-----------------------------------------------