[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Peter Allgeyer <allgeyer at web dot de>
 To:  Kris Maglione <bsdaemon at comcast dot net>
 Cc:  m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall-dev] Reject with 'tcp/udp'
 Date:  Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:31:04 +0200
Am Samstag, den 10.09.2005, 16:23 -0400 schrieb Kris Maglione:

> Anyway, if the pre-processor would be desirable to anyone besides me,
> I'll write it. I've got a few methods in mind, it's just a matter of
> which would be the most efficient in PHP.
IMHO, it's never bad to have a small piece of code where one can see
what exactly you have in mind.

> >I was also wondering, if it makes
> >sense, to allow to select how to respond to a blocked packet
> >(return-icmp-as-dest(port-unr) for example). I left that out because of
> >simplicity.
> >  
> >
> In my opinion, that option should be hidden and expanded with an
> 'Advanced' type link (javascript, rather than loading a new page), or
> just hidden in config.xml. It would definately confuse most users. It
> might be acceptable, though, if the responses were listed as simple terms.

I would prefer a hidden option. Experts searching for such a thing will
find the documentation of hidden options. Others won't need it ;-)

Ciao ...
	... PIT ...


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 copyleft(c) by |           Anybody want a binary telemetry frame
 Peter Allgeyer |   _-_     editor written in Perl?  -- Larry Wall in
                | 0(o_o)0   <199708012226 dot PAA22015 at wall dot org>
---------------oOO--(_)--OOo-----------------------------------------------