[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Peter Allgeyer <allgeyer at web dot de>
 To:  Youri Kersloot <YKersloot at CrossingChannels dot com>
 Cc:  m0n0wall dash dev at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall-dev] OpenVPN on beta10: missing routingoptionandsome bugs?
 Date:  Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:38:22 +0200
Hi Youri!

Am Mittwoch, den 21.09.2005, 11:16 +0200 schrieb Youri Kersloot:
> I've dug into this issue a little bit further and suddenly it'd hit me.
> To support the push-route in a basic way, their shouldn't be only a
> checkbox, but also a droplist for which subnet the route rule should be
> made.
Yes I know that. But imagine not sending only one subnet but several
ones. For example: Having two internal subnets, one for accounting
department ( and one for marketing (
Additionally you have a DMZ ( with you webserver, that the
marketing is administering.

You want your clients to have access to the DMZ and the marketing
department, but not to the accounting department:

Push "route"
Push "route"

How do we add them by only one drop down list w/o having group objects?
Should we have more than one drop down list?

> The expert option would be really really reaaally great!!! Do you have a
> clue on which term this could be realised?
This will be the preferred way till we have a good and usuable new
object design. At the moment there are two things I'm working on:

1) bug fixing the actual 1.2b10-ovpnX tree
2) implementing new features in a 1.2b10-ovpn-test tree

Since 1) is prior to 2) I will code this, if I have time for it.
Sometimes where are questions to help coding so this would be a nice
project if anybody has time, skill and is looking to go for sth. It's
not difficult since there are enough examples how to do this in the
existing code.

Ciao ...
	... PIT ...

 copyleft(c) by |   _-_      Where is 'bavaria' proper? I thought
 Peter Allgeyer | 0(o_o)0   it was austria.  -- Seen on #Linux