Chet Harvey wrote:
> Maybe we should begin dialog about m0n0 branches. I like the purist idea of
> m0n0 as a firewall only but what if there were branches like m0n0IDS and
> m0n0Proxy and m0n0AP?
This can be acomplished easily with the use of modules. As I said
earlier, m0n0 can be even lighter. not all people use captive, or PPTP
vpns, this can be build using modules. If you want is just add to your
> I strip the captive portal stuff outta my vanilla firewalls.....
I also strip some thing from m0n0....
> Of course the burdeon would not be on Manuel to maintain these "ports".
I agree. I think this is the problem of having branches, and can lead us
to have a more complex way to mantain m0n0, and definitly this is not
I have lots of Thoughts... :)