[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Chet Harvey <chet at pittech dot com>
 To:  Dave Warren <maillist at devilsplayground dot net>
 Cc:  Johan Bergquist <johan dot bergquist at fredab dot se>, 'sai' <list at ebs dot net dot pk>, m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Full PC m0n0 - was Re: [m0n0wall] Captive with IMAP
 Date:  Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:13:53 -0400
I guess when I was talking branches I didnt mean like BSD...splitting off each
on their own. Use the current base but add the necessary features (bloat if you
will) to make a full IDS, not watered down due to space limitations or features
dropped for whatever reason. Again...these owned by another contributor much
like ports collection.

Modules would be nice for the small onesy, twosey kinda things but not for say a
full flegded Access Point of IDS/IPS/NIDS. Then again it could just be it's
late, I am tired and this new version of syslog-ng just isnt playing nice w/
m0n0.....so I am going to bed!

Chet Harvey
Pitbull Technologies <http://www.pittech.com/> 
Protecting your Digital Assets

Quoting Dave Warren <maillist at devilsplayground dot net>:

> Johan Bergquist wrote:
> >I'm all for of diffrent branches.... It will be easier to maintain and to
> give support... But it will be harder to upgrade and all that stuff... But
> it's a good idea...
> >  
> >
> Personally, I think branching is a horrible idea.  I think back to VNC, 
> where there were 3-4 branchs being actively developed, each having a few 
> features that put them above the others, but none offering a complete 
> solution.
> A modular solution is much better in that you can use whichever features 
> you like without having to give up another branch's improvements.
> -- 
> What's orange, brown, black, and red? Give up? 
> They're COLOURS, idiot!
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch