[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Mitch \(WebCob\)" <mitch at webcob dot com>
 To:  "'William Marcelo Piovezan'" <william at uli dot com dot br>, m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] Souce based policy routing,
 Date:  Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:07:52 -0700
My rules are in a few different native FreeBSD setups. have a couple
different things I've tried - simple default connection failover (supporting
inbound on both links if they are up) as well as attempts at using both by
switching rulesets etc. but they are with ipfw - not ipf and not in mono.


I wonder - can ipfw and ipf work together in mono?


I've heard they can be made to interoperate in other systems - do they work
in mono? What's the order?





From: William Marcelo Piovezan [mailto:william at uli dot com dot br] 
Sent: October 21, 2004 17:34
To: Mitch (WebCob); m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] Souce based policy routing,


I am using now a custom Linux solution with iproute2 and this routing policy
is pretty simple to implement there. But m0n0wall is very compact and could
be an interesting replacement. Could you tell me if have you defined your
ipfw rules in a m0n0wall system or in a native FreeBSD machine?

Best Regards,


At 01:55 21/10/2004, Mitch \(WebCob\) wrote:

There's a bunch of people looking for answers like this - don't think any
are complete yet... I have stuff that works for my on ipfw, but I'm still
wrapping my head around ipf ;-)