+-------------+
BACKBONE1----WAN--|   m0n0wall  |-OPT1------BACKBONE2
                   +-------------+
                          | LAN (192.168.1.0/24)
                          |
                          | IP's 192.168.1.1 ~ 192.168.1.127 with WAN gateway
                          | IP's 192.168.1.128 ~ 192.168.1.254 with OPT1 
gateway


Suppose that I split LAN network IP's in two groups so IP ranging from 
192.168.1.1 ~ 192.168.1.127 would be routed by WAN (with NAT). The IP's 
192.168.1.128 ~ 192.168.1.254 would be routed by OPT1 interface (with NAT).

There is no need of failover or redundancy feature but only this static 
configuration.

Best Regards,

William.


At 15:07 22/10/2004, Mitch \(WebCob\) wrote:
>My rules are in a few different native FreeBSD setups… have a couple 
>different things I’ve tried – simple default connection failover 
>(supporting inbound on both links if they are up) as well as attempts at 
>using both by switching rulesets etc… but they are with ipfw – not ipf and 
>not in mono.
>
>I wonder – can ipfw and ipf work together in mono?
>
>I’ve heard they can be made to interoperate in other systems – do they 
>work in mono? What’s the order?
>
>m/
>
>
>----------
>From: William Marcelo Piovezan [mailto:william at uli dot com dot br]
>Sent: October 21, 2004 17:34
>To: Mitch (WebCob); m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] Souce based policy routing,
>
>I am using now a custom Linux solution with iproute2 and this routing 
>policy is pretty simple to implement there. But m0n0wall is very compact 
>and could be an interesting replacement. Could you tell me if have you 
>defined your ipfw rules in a m0n0wall system or in a native FreeBSD machine?
>
>Best Regards,
>
>William.
>
>
>At 01:55 21/10/2004, Mitch \(WebCob\) wrote:
>
>There's a bunch of people looking for answers like this - don't think any
>are complete yet... I have stuff that works for my on ipfw, but I'm still
>wrapping my head around ipf ;-)
>
>m/
>
>
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------
>Esta mensagem foi verificada por Ultralink-Scanner
>e nenhum virus foi encontrado.
>
>Web Server Ultralink: http://www.ultralink.com.br
>--------------------------------------------------
>


--------------------------------------------------
Esta mensagem foi verificada por Ultralink-Scanner
e nenhum virus foi encontrado.

Web Server Ultralink: http://www.ultralink.com.br
--------------------------------------------------