|
||||||||
On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 11:30, Vincent Fleuranceau wrote: > The problem is that you won't always seat on the same 'side' of the > router: sometimes on the WAN side, sometimes on the LAN side... Could that be solved by putting two extra interfaces on the router, and forwarding vpn-trafic into a specific interface? something like this? WAN-->-- DMZ1 ->--+ LAN-->-- MONO | WLAN->-- DMZ2--<--+ all vpn-traffic from WAN/LAN/WLAN is forwarded to DMZ1 and going into the DMZ2 interface where the vpn-software is listening? (ok just a crasy idea) > I don't know if it's a real problem, but I guess IPsec won't like > this... OpenVPN (if binding all interfaces) may work -- not tested. Why should/would they care about how I get in? if the deamon is listening on all interfaces i'd say it should work. What about the nat problem? My router is running a static IP _and_ available thru dns-lookup (though rDNS do not give the same name) -- Henning Wangerin <mailinglists dash after dash 041101 underscore reply dash not dash possible at hpc dot dk> |