|
||||||||
Hi, Sorry. When I was typing this the phone was ringing off the hook. Here's the working config from Linux. I can't seem to get this setup working on the m0n0wall box. #!/bin/bash WAN_IFACE="eth0" WAN_ROUTER="xx.xx.xx.yy" LAN_IFACE="eth1" WAN_IP="xx.xx.xx.xx/24" LAN_IP="192.168.1.252/24" dhcpcd -k sleep 5 ip link set dev $WAN_IFACE down ip link set dev $LAN_IFACE down ip addr add dev $WAN_IFACE $WAN_IP ip addr add dev $LAN_IFACE $LAN_IP ip link set dev $WAN_IFACE up ip link set dev $LAN_IFACE up ip route add default via $WAN_ROUTER ip route add 192.168.3.0/24 via 192.168.1.254 ip route add 192.168.5.0/24 via 192.168.1.254 ip route add 192.168.7.0/24 via 192.168.1.254 # Masquerade local subnet iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.0/24 -o $WAN_IFACE -j MASQUERADE iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.3.0/24 -o $WAN_IFACE -j MASQUERADE iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.5.0/24 -o $WAN_IFACE -j MASQUERADE iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.7.0/24 -o $WAN_IFACE -j MASQUERADE Thanks, Gerry Andreas Gracco wrote: >Yes this also doesn't work! > >The gateway has everytime to be in the same subnet! > >LAN:192.168.4.0/24:192.168.1.254 >LAN:192.168.5.0/24:192.168.1.254 > >Where are the other router plugged to? > > > Internet > | > | >[m0n0wall publicIP 192.168.1.252] (here you need to add the 2 routes above) > | > | > --LAN 192.168.1.0/24-- > | > | >[router 192.168.1.254 + 192.168.4.252] (here "dest. 192.168.5.0/24 gw 192.168.4.254" > | and the default route to 192.168.1.252) > | > --LAN 192.168.4.0/24-- > | > | >[router 192.168.4.254 + 192.168.5.254] (here you only need the default route to 192.168.4.252) > | > | > --LAN 192.168.5.0/24-- > > > > >Hi, > >Thanks for the help ;) . > >I still can't get it to work. Here is the current config. > >M0n0wall Router > >WAN xx.xx.xx.xx (public) >LAN 192.168.1.252 > >Static Routes >LAN:192.168.4.0/24:192.168.4.254 >LAN:192.168.5.0/24:192.168.5.254 > >Router A: 192.168.1.254 >Router B: 192.168.4.254 >Router C: 192.168.5.254 > > >The 192.168.1.0 network has internet >The other networks can ping the LAN side of the m0nowall box, but have >no internet > >Thanks, >Gerry > > >Andreas Gracco wrote: > > > >>Hi >> >>I think this is why the subnet of the m0n0wall itself also is in 192.168.0.0/16, this wont work! >>Add a rule for every subnet... like >> >>192.168.4.0/24 - 192.168.1.254 >>192.168.5.0/24 - 192.168.1.254 >> >> >>i hope this helps... >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Hello All, >> >>I'm having a routing problem with m0n0wall. I'm trying to replace a >>Soekris box which was running Linux with the same running m0n0wall. My >>network setup is below: >> >>M0n0wall Router >> >>WAN xx.xx.xx.xx (public) >>LAN 192.168.1.252 >> >>Router A: 192.168.1.254 >>Router B: 192.168.4.254 >>Router C: 192.168.5.254 >> >>The problem is that when I assign a static route of 192.168.0.0/16 - >>192.168.1.254 on the m0n0wall box, I lose internet access to all. The >>private nets have access to each other though. Does anyone have any >>thoughts? >> >>Thanks, >>Gerry >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- Gerry Weaver IT-Pro Corp. Office: (254) 883-9040 Mobile: (512) 663-9550 Fax : (254) 883-9041 |