[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "C. Falconer" <cfalconer at avonside dot school dot nz>
 To:  "'Jason J. Ellingson'" <jason at ellingson dot com>
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] m0n0wall to m0n0wall IPSec Issues
 Date:  Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:13:37 +1300
How much overhead does an IPSec tunnel create?

I have 128 Kbit "broadband" (yeah I know) at home, and 2 mbit/512k at work

Is it even worth bothering with such a small pipe?



-----Original Message-----
From: Jason J. Ellingson [mailto:jason at ellingson dot com] 
Sent: Tuesday, 16 November 2004 12:48 p.m.
To: 'Chris Breish'
Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] m0n0wall to m0n0wall IPSec Issues


Look in the archives.  About a month ago, I posted my IPSEC mono to mono
setup.  At least two people emailed me saying it worked for them.

My monowalls are even different versions and I have no problems.  (one is
1.1b16, and the other is 1.2b2)

Also, don't forget to open the set a rule to allow ESP (also check the
"allow fragments" for that ESP rule) to your m0n0 IP.
------------------------------------------------------------
Jason J Ellingson
Technical Consultant

615.301.1682 : nashville
612.605.1132 : minneapolis

www.ellingson.com
jason at ellingson dot com

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Breish [mailto:cbreish at pchelpservice dot com] 
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 5:00 PM
To: 'Andreas Gracco'
Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] m0n0wall to m0n0wall IPSec Issues

I switched to main, and changed both sides to "My IP address" Still no
joy...
Thanks for the suggestions so far.
...