[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Dub Dublin <dub at infowave dot com>
 To:  Chris Bagnall <m0n0wall at minotaur dot cc>
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Bug Report: Inbound NAT automatic rule creation
 Date:  Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:53:26 -0600
I wish it were that easy - this is a biz-class DSL connection, so all 
ports sail right through, as they should.  The existing mail & web 
server has been in operation for a couple of years and still works this 

Chris Bagnall wrote:

>I concur with James - my m0n0 box at home has both ports 25 and 80 answering
>on the WAN interface quite successfully.
>Can I suggest trying to run the NAT rules you were planning on running on
>ports 26 and 81 respectively, and see if they work that way.
>Unfortunately, these days it's not uncommon for ISPs to block port 25. A
>sign of the virus/trojan-infested times I guess. In fact, it's becoming
>quite a challenge to find ISPs that *don't* block port 25.