Thanks for the reply, geez and I googled this first, I guess I used the wrong
search attributes or something.... :(

-b

Quoting Chris Buechler <cbuechler at gmail dot com>:

> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:33:16 -0500, Bill Hamel <billh at bugs dot hamel dot net> wrote:
> > In this topology m0n0 has a wireless interface configured as an AP. I wish
> to
> > pass regular internet traffic across the wireless interface and an
> ethernet
> > interface and limit by mac address who can connect to the AP.
> > 
> > Currently I have the AP configured which is M0n0 1.1 and the Wireless
> interface
> > is bridged to the Optional interface. Internet traffic runs through the
> bridge
> > using non-private IP adressing just dandy, but now I want to limit by MAC
> > address who can connect to the AP.
> > 
> > Is this possible ?
> > 
> 
> http://m0n0.ch/wall/docbook/faq-macfilt.html
> 
> 
> > Captive portal seems like a nice way of doing it but it looks as like I am
> > limited because it seems to require you run NAT thereby loosing the ability
> to
> > route native internet traffic. And Trying to run captive portal on a
> bridged
> > interface is not allowed.
> > 
> 
> You don't have to use NAT, if you have enough public IP's to put a
> public subnet on your OPT interface you can use a sub-subnet of your
> public subnet on that OPT interface.  Or you can do 1:1 NAT.
> 
> But you can't use captive portal on a bridged interface.
> 
> -Chris
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by the Bugs.Hamel.Net MailScanner, 
> and appears to be clean.
> 
> 




----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the Bugs.Hamel.Net MailScanner, 
and appears to be clean.