On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 20:58, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Henning Wangerin wrote:
> > I need to handle at least two PPPoE sessions simultaniusly, as I need at
> > least two IPs.
> You know that you can bind multiple IPs to the WAN interface via the
> NAT -> Server NAT feature, right?
Yeah, but that don't help on getting another public IP, as they're
handed out by the PPPoE link, or am I wrong here?
> I do this currently to enable a separation
> between my private LAN and my public DMZ. All NAT rules go through a secondary
> IP bound to the WAN interface, while DMZ traffic passes through the default
> IP assigned directly to the PPPoE link.
I don't get your setup. DO you have a sketch of it?
Henning Wangerin <post plus 041008 at henning dot wangerin dot dk>
Henning Wangerin <mailinglists dash after dash 041101 underscore reply dash not dash possible at hpc dot dk>