Henning Wangerin wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 07:27, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
>>Henning Wangerin wrote:
>>One thing I learned during my quest to get m0n0wall set up with a fully
>>functional DMZ is that PPPoE is not capable of specifying a netmask. So
> Correct. PPPoE "delivers" a single IP, so that will be a /32 adress.
>>you will never want to bridge with a PPPoE WAN interface because PPPoE
>>is only capable of assigning one static IP.
> I'm not looking for bridging. I requesting the possibility to create
> multible PPPoE conenctions/sessions to the same box, to get multible IPs
> assigned (on multiple interfaces if that would solve the problem)
>>If you need a subnet routed,
>>then that's OK, and it works, but you won't ever see anything other than a
>>255.255.255.255 netmask on your PPPoE interface.
> I don't have a routed subnet. Just three separate PPPoE logins to my
> ISP. This setup is very common here in Denmark, if you need multiple IPs
Ah. Well, nevermind then. WingNET usually routes a subnet if a customer needs
multiple IPs. I'd be interested to hear about any resolutions you can find
to your problem.
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.1 - Release Date: 11/19/2004