My bad... I saw the Cisco 2600 in your diagram and went off on a
tangent. Second look revealed you were depicting that as being on the
far side of your DSL link. In this case, I got nothing.

Good luck,

Josh McAllister

-----Original Message-----
From: Henning Wangerin
[mailto:mailinglists dash after dash 041101 underscore reply dash not dash possible at hpc dot dk] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 4:09 AM
To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] Re: Re: Multiple PPPoE sessions to ISP

On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 01:47, Josh McAllister wrote:
> You could have the Cisco establish your multiple PPPOE sessions over
the

Ehh, I've got no Cisco - just a m0n0wall, a linux server and a
DLInk-router, what I want to combine into the monowall-box

> do need IPSEC or SIP or some other NAT un-friendly protocol would be
to
> let the Cisco establish one PPPOE session (eg. For your DMZ) and let
> m0n0 get the other.

This is one of the things I want to avoid: All those small boxes
floating around ;-)
-- 
Henning Wangerin <mailinglists dash after dash 041101 underscore reply dash not dash possible at hpc dot dk>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch