[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Mat Murdock <mmurdock underscore lists at kimballequipment dot com>
 To:  "'m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch'" <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] M0n0wall Feature Comparison
 Date:  Mon, 20 Dec 2004 12:11:47 -0700
Do you know how many PPTP endpoints it supports?

Mat

Jason Humes wrote:

>Hi
>The Pix506e will do PPTP endpoint termination, and also has an SSL Web Based
>Administration utility, PDM (its actually MUCH MUCH better since version
>3.02 came out.).  Thanks  Anyone ever do any speed tests through these
>firewalls, either the pix or the m0n0wall...I have, and would like to
>compare notes.  I've done these tests using different packet sizes and found
>very differing results.  Thanks.
>
>Jason
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mat Murdock [mailto:mmurdock underscore lists at kimballequipment dot com] 
>Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 1:40 PM
>To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>Subject: [m0n0wall] M0n0wall Feature Comparison
>
>
>I've made a pdf comparing M0n0wall to a Cisco 506e.  I wanted to make 
>sure that my comparison was accurate.  Any input would be helpful.  It 
>can be viewed here:  http://kimballequipment.com/mono/features.pdf  Any 
>input would be appreciated.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Mat Murdock
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>  
>