[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Mat Murdock <mmurdock underscore lists at kimballequipment dot com>
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] M0n0wall Feature Comparison
 Date:  Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:44:02 -0700
I am using a wrap board in the comparison. Thanks for everyone's comments.

Mat

Chris Buechler wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 14:48:53 -0500, Robert Staph
><rstaph at digitalimpreza dot com> wrote:
>  
>
>>The number if interfaces might need adjusting, m0n0wall supports more than
>>3, not sure of exactly how many more though (as many as you have free
>>IRQs?).  Same goes for flash mem, RAM, and Processor...  Unless you are
>>talking about soekris or WRAP only hardware, which you might want to define
>>a bit better.  (and even when talking about soekris you can get an add-on
>>dual or quad interface board).
>>
>>    
>>
>
>I believe he's comparing to a WRAP board, so those things are all
>fixed in that comparison.
>
>
>  
>
>>I'm not sue of what platform the Cisco runs on, but its probably not PC
>>based.  You'll want to mention that.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>It is nothing more than a standard Intel PC.  In fact you can throw a
>Cisco flash card (they're ISA) into an Intel 440BX motherboard, throw
>in some Intel NIC's, and have your own (illegal) cheap PIX.  Google
>PIX clone if you want details.
>
>-Chris
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>  
>