I don't think hardware will be an issue at the main site I have a 1.8 
with a gig available.

Node B cannot talk to Node C.  This would be a huge sercuity issue.
Since the sites are different organizations, I just need to encrypt the 
sql traffic back to the main sql server.

Thanks for all the help,


Jeb


James W. McKeand wrote:
> Jeb Barger wrote:
> 
>>This a great product, however, I need to setup some point to point
>>boxes around my work's wan.  I knew that one mwall will ipsec nicely
>>to another, however, can it handle two connections?  For example,
>>node A  IPSEC===>  Node B
>>node A  IPSEC===>  Node C
>>
>>with only having one mwall at each site.  Can it be done?
>>
>>
>>Jeb
> 
> 
> Yes, it can be done. I would even suggest a Node B ===> Node C
> connection to simplify the routing. This has been discussed before on
> the list. If I remember correctly, the biggest question has been
> sizing of the m0n0walls. I do not think embedded platforms are
> suggested for this application. I may be wrong, someone correct if I
> am...
> 
> Does anyone know the if there is a limit on tunnels you can establish,
> or is it up to your hardware?
> 
> _________________________________
> James W. McKeand
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
>