[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Keith Redfield" <kredfield at airsurfwireless dot com>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] m0n0 VPN static routing problem
 Date:  Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:24:54 -0800
And 10.100.100.x will need to be an endpoint for the VPN as well I take it.
Ooh..not good..I'll need about a dozen VPN's/VLAN's...
This is contrary to the way I would have expected the tunnel to work - is that something up for
consideration as a feature enhancement?


From: Chris Buechler [mailto:cbuechler at gmail dot com]
Sent: Thu 1/27/2005 8:50 AM
To: Keith Redfield
Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] m0n0 VPN static routing problem

You can't just throw in static routes because traffic to 10.100.100.x
won't be seen as needing to go through the tunnel.  You can create a
second IPsec connection between the two m0n0walls for the 10.100.100.x
net and that should work.