[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Andrew White" <andywhite at ntlworld dot ie>
 To:  "'Mark De Groot'" <mdegroot at bettenimports dot net>, <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] VLANS over IPSEC VPN?
 Date:  Sat, 5 Feb 2005 01:30:12 -0000
The cisco phones can be fully routed, and do not need to be on the same
vlan.  All they need is dhcp and option 150 or next-server to be sent so
they can find the callmanager, or manually set it on the phones.

Andrew 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark De Groot [mailto:mdegroot at bettenimports dot net] 
Sent: 05 February 2005 00:15
To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: [m0n0wall] VLANS over IPSEC VPN?

Hello all,

I have several subnets tied together with IPSEC VPN's using Monowall at 3
remote sites and a Watchguard Firebox X700 at the main location.  We have
Cisco IP phones that run on a specific voice VLAN (separate VLAN for data)
and subnet at the main location.  I would like to place some Cisco IP phones
at the remote sites, however I think that for them to work correctly I need
to have them on the same subnet as the phones at the main site so that they
get an IP address from the main site's (voice VLAN) DHCP server. Has anyone
done this before?  Am I going about this the wrong way?

 

Many thanks in advance!

Mark